AntiqueLures

 

Grading Antique Fishing Lures

By Dr. Michael Echols

   

 

Fact: Everyone has problems when grading older lures or boxes because it is totally subjective.

(Subjective: an adjective; of or resulting from the feelings of the person thinking; not objective; a personal feeling or opinion)

 Factors which change box or lure grading

 Extensive article on grading boxes

VISUAL VALUES:

Visual values vary considerably from person to person. As we all know, not everyone has good taste or appreciation for details. (What other explanation is there for people who buy ugly dogs?)  Being old is no excuse for poor condition. I don't know how many times I've heard a guy lecture me on the fact that: "these lures are over 80 years old you know, so you have to expect a few chips and scrapes". And I reply, "True, sir, but the price will have to adjust accordingly for the chips and scrapes!" If you've got chips and scrapes, then we are not talking excellent condition or excellent prices.

Mint or New In The Box:

Excellent :

Examples: below are two early c. 1913-1920 Shakespeare underwater minnows in absolute Excellent condition. The paint is glossy or "lipstick shiny". There is no crazing, no chips near the tail or nose prop, no hook drags, and no varnish flakes. The hardware is shiny and there is no rust. This is really into the level of Excellent plus or mint.  This is what I collect...!

gexc1.jpg (21254 bytes)   gexc2.jpg (32701 bytes)

 

Excellent has two parts:

Please note: Since I don't collect lures in grades less than Excellent Minus, the rest (very good, good, fair, average) is academic so I don't cover those grades in detail here, but they are covered below by example...

DEFINITIONS AND TERMS:

The following are terms and illustrations of defects which alter the grade of a lure. No one defect will set the grade, but these are the types of problems which differentiate between excellent and excellent minus or between excellent minus and very good.

In the photo there is one pointer near the tail area on the black back.

Depending on the extent and number, pointers are not a huge factor unless the bait is being passed as mint or excellent.  The more pointers the lower the grade.   Large and deep pointers like those on this red and black spotted lure can drop a grade to Very Good quickly.

grade1.jpg (23785 bytes)

The photo illustrates multiple (severe) varnish flaking on the belly.  Flakes  can be a big factor in down-grading depending on the extent.  How much you count paint off the belly weight is a personal call since so many baits have this problem it almost seems the be the norm, but that is no excuse. Paint off is paint off...downgrade it.  This lure would grade Below Average.

grade5.jpg (50251 bytes)

 

The red and green spotted, five sided, Heddon series 00 below is notorious for flaked varnish due to all the sharp edges. This one is in Excellent minus or perhaps Very Good plus, plus due to a couple of light varnish rubs (lighter areas) between the cups. There is a ring around the belly weight, but no paint loss (yet!). There are no hook drags, no chips into the paint, no significant cracks.

gexcmin.jpg (26439 bytes)

The photo exhibits extensive, rather than minor or micro crazing. It's a personal choice as to the effect on the grading.  As it gets more extensive, it is a detriment. In older Heddons,  if minor, it can be an asset to determine authenticity. 

grdcrazn.jpg (27750 bytes)

gcrazing.jpg (7785 bytes)

This example shows a semi circular mark made by the hooks as they swing around.  Typically this problem quickly down-grades the condition into the Very good range. grade4.jpg (43302 bytes)
In this illustration, there are both age crazing and the one deep crack into the wood.  This is more a personal problem than a big deal in the grading. It depends on the extent of the crack, but usually a reason to down grade the lure.

grdcrck.jpg (22592 bytes)

A chip this size starts this lure grade at very good minus and other factors might take it down further. Chips or paint loss are a very big deal in grading. You got chips down to the wood, you got problems!   This chip would keep this lure in the Good range at best.

grdchip.jpg (49037 bytes)

Click here for an EXTENSIVE LIST of factors on lure grading

Following are some examples of Lesser Quality lures:

Below, is a Heddon 100 that has a number of problems which would rate it as only Good to Average at best.

Problems: Large areas of varnish flakes, scrapes, pointers to the wood. When this much varnish and paint are scraped or flaked off, then you are into Average at best.   

This 100 has a couple of problems.  Note the paint chips to the wood on the tail.  The usual fine cracks are too extensive.  Although 'crazing'  is normal for baits this age, in this case it's too extensive.. It appears the larger cracks are deep and most likely there will be future flaking of the paint because the cracks are so large and extensive. This bait would then only grade   There are multiple pointers, and flaking of the varnish.  Average.

grade3.jpg (38299 bytes)

Below, is a Shakespeare 5 hook Musky as an example of a great old rare (c. 1907) bait which has been subjected to cleaning the varnish as well as some of the paint off down to the white primer. (Many Shakespeares get cleaned to the point where they become "white" lures.) There are hook drags in to the paint. It has paint off the sides, belly weight, and tail down to the wood. No matter how you grade this bait, it grades as Fair to Poor.

shkmusk2.jpg (21254 bytes)

Grading Boxes

 EXTENSIVE LIST of factors which change box grading

EXTENSIVE ARTICLE on grading boxes 

Mint--Box should look like it came off the shelf. Crisp, no dirt, corners sharp, and no wear. All lettering crisp and clear. Price tags or written price should not detract.  Structure of the box must be stiff and unwarped.   No water marks or sunlight fading damage.

Excellent--Box will have very minor wear to the corners and some wear around the edges. All wording and lettering should be clear. No rips or tears. Price tags or written price should not detract.  Structure of the box must be stiff and unwarped.   No water marks or sunlight damage.

Very Good--Box will have wear to corners and wear around edges. Box may have light soiling or light water marks. Box may have very minor tears (e.g., paper label applied that is starting to peel up) or very small dents. Some of the lettering may be slightly worn.  Structure is still there, box will be square at corners and along panels.  No mushyness to the side or tops.

Good--Box will have dirt, stains or water marks. Probably looks "dingy" overall. Lettering will be worn, but you should be able to read part of it. Box may have tears or repairs with tape.  Structure may be distorted and joints of the box may be split.  Sides of box are not straight or stiff.

Poor--Barely readable lettering. Stains, soiling, with tears or parts of the box missing (end flap, etc.).  Structure is gone, box not stiff or squared.  Sides, bottom or top are mushy due to water damage.

Return to AntiqueLures homepage

A FULL TOPICAL INDEX FOR ANTIQUELURES

A LIST OF ALL EARLY FISHING LURES IN THIS COLLECTION